Longitudinal cohort study examines product dependence and its impact on smoking behavior transitions, suggesting tailored cessation strategies.
INTRODUCTION: Measures of cigarette and e-cigarette dependence may predict product transitions, and they could be used to inform tailored messaging for cigarette cessation. METHODS: We used data from a longitudinal cohort study of 353 adults who smoked cigarettes daily, with or without e-cigarettes, with product dependence assessed at baseline and year one and follow-up visits every two months (enrolled 2015-17 in Madison and Milwaukee, WI). We estimated continuous, non-linear associations between the brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives scores for cigarettes (WISDM) and e-cigarettes (e-WISDM) with transition rates using a multistate transition model. RESULTS: Lower WISDM scores were associated with lower rates of transitioning from cigarette-only to dual use; only 3.5% (95% CI: 1.4%, 9.3%) of those at the 10th WISDM percentile were predicted to transition to dual use compared with 25.0% (95% CI: 14.0%, 39.1%) at the 50th percentile. Higher e-WISDM scores were associated with lower rate of transitioning from dual use to either cigarette-only or e-cigarette-only use, with 50.7% (95% CI: 31.9%, 65.7%) of those who used both products predicted to continue to do so at the 50th percentile of e-WISDM compared with 91.1% (95% CI: 78.7%, 96.1%) predicted to continue both products at the 90th percentile. Ratios of e-WISDM:WISDM above 1 were associated with an increased likelihood of transitioning from dual to e-cigarette-only rather than cigarette-only use. CONCLUSIONS: Product dependence scores were non-linearly associated with transition rates between cigarette and e-cigarette use, which may help to guide the development of personalized, adaptive cigarette cessation recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: