This document is released as a public technical research note. It is not part of the formal Architecture of Limitation corpus and should not be read as a preprint or theoretical extension. This report examines the Ministral local LM experimentation recorded in the run-comparison document, with `K0ᵥ43. yaml` used as the governing diagnostic constraint. The central finding is not that a local model can execute AoL/AoLOS perfectly. That claim is not supported by the experiment. The stronger finding is that a less sophisticated local substrate makes collapse signals more visible: linguistic capture under K1, formal overclassification under K0G, and framework over-assimilation under K0. Most importantly, the K0 runs exposed that unused stack elements named inside a contract, wrapper, or runner can become active influences in the reasoning field, even when mentioned only as exclusions. This shifts the design lesson from “add clearer prohibitions” to “declare only the active field. ” The experiment therefore succeeds not by arriving at the expected benchmark result, but by making an otherwise hidden AoLOS design weakness observable and correctable.
Franky Schaut (Mon,) studied this question.