Formalized mechanisms of displacement and return in social systems highlight cost structures, suggesting new frameworks for understanding order and disorder.
Existing frameworks for tracking displaced costs describe segments of the displacement — the shift (Kapp), the aggregate balance (Georgescu-Roegen), the attentional toll (Stiegler) — but not the full cycle that links them. This paper formalises the anthropic loop: a social system displaces its disorder towards a receptacle (E1), the load accumulates (E2) until saturation (E3), returns to the emitting system (E4), which re-displaces towards a new receptacle or reconfigures (E5). The apparatus holds in nine definitions, five states, three conditions — two of receptacle saturation, one of transfer arrest — four forms of return, and six propositions of differentiated status: one methodological postulate, two structural corollaries, three empirical propositions. The claimed contribution is threefold: the articulation of receptacle, mediation, latency and transmutation into a transhistorical institutional state machine; condition C3, which treats the invisibility of a transfer as a maintenance cost; and an ex ante protocol disciplining both the assertion of displacement and the certification of internalisation. Anthropy (Lalut) — a mechanism of circulation — is explicitly distinguished from anthropy (Stiegler), a measure of production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephane LALUT (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: