Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Public debate on secularism stalls because the word has become a banner: we label, we accuse, we stop listening. A detour through the history and geography of the "wall of separation" shows that one word covers opposite objects. Going back to the purpose of secularism — holding a plural society together — reveals a summit almost everyone shares; our disagreements then bear only on the paths to reach it, and those, in turn, can be discussed. This column opens a series. Op-ed no. 2, published on laiciscope.org; critical material tied to the book "Laïcité through the Lens of Reason" (D. A. Zighed).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djamel A. Zighed (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: