Mitral valve prolapse was present in 14% of ARVC patients and was associated with higher LV mass (93 vs 75 g/m2, P=0.02) and more LV wall motion abnormalities (27% vs 5%, P=0.02).
Observational (n=111)
MVP is present in 14% of ARVC patients and is associated with PKP2 variants and features of arrhythmogenic left-sided cardiomyopathy such as increased LV mass and wall motion abnormalities.
Background Concomitant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have only been described in case reports. Little is known about genetic and phenotypic characteristics of these patients. Objective To describe the prevalence, genetics, and imaging characteristics of MVP in ARVC patients. Methods We identified 111 definite ARVC cases through medical record review, arrhythmia/cardiomyopathy targeted gene panels, and contrast cardiac magnetic resonance data. MVP was diagnosed on echocardiography as mitral leaflet displacement >2 mm above the annular plane in systole, “borderline MVP” defined as ≤2 mm. Results We found MVP/borderline MVP in 14% of ARVC patients. Cardiac arrest occurred in 20% of those with MVP/borderline MVP compared to 16% without valve abnormalities. Among 69 ARVC patients with identified genetic variants, PKP2 mutations were highly prevalent (64%), particularly in those with MVP (83%). Most MVPs had posterior prolapse (73%) and trace/mild mitral regurgitation (87%). None had mitral annular disjunction. ARVCs with MVP had higher LV mass (93 vs 75 g/m 2 , P = .02) and a higher prevalence of LV wall motion abnormalities (27% vs 5%, P = .02) compared to ARVCs without valve abnormalities. Conclusions MVP is prevalent in ARVC and characterized by PKP2 variants in most cases. Typical features of arrhythmic MVP like bileaflet involvement and annular disjunction are rare in ARVC with MVP; features of arrhythmogenic left-sided cardiomyopathy – increased LV mass index and wall motion abnormalities – are more common. Further studies are needed to understand the role of MVP in arrhythmic risk stratification of ARVC.
Rich et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (n=111). Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) or borderline MVP vs. ARVC without valve abnormalities was evaluated on Prevalence of MVP/borderline MVP. Mitral valve prolapse was present in 14% of ARVC patients and was associated with higher LV mass (93 vs 75 g/m2, P=0.02) and more LV wall motion abnormalities (27% vs 5%, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: