Key result
The avatar-based HF-app digital coach experienced severe enrollment barriers (only 28% enrolled), with younger age (OR 0.89) and higher education (OR 1.58) significantly predicting successful enrollment.
Why the study?
Effective education and patient engagement are fundamental in HF, but whether an avatar-based HF-app could improve outcomes by enhancing knowledge, quality of life, and self-care behaviour remained to be determined.
Does an avatar-based HF-app improve engagement and self-care in elderly, high-risk patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure?
RCT (n=72)
Open Blind
Prospective Randomized Open Blind design in blocks of six, stratified by HF type and enrolment site
Yes
Does an avatar-based HF-app improve engagement and self-care in elderly, high-risk patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 0.89 (95% CI 0.82–0.97)
p-value: p=<0.01
AI-based m-Health education faces severe barriers to enrollment and engagement in elderly, post-acute, and critically ill heart failure patients.
Severe enrollment barriers limit avatar-based HF-app use in acute HF; challenges feasibility of digital coaching without adaptations for older, less-educated patients.
Aims Effective and efficient education and patient engagement are fundamental to improve health outcomes in heart failure (HF). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enable more effective delivery of education is becoming more widespread for a range of chronic conditions. We sought to determine whether an avatar-based HF-app could improve outcomes by enhancing HF knowledge and improving patient quality of life and self-care behaviour. Methods and results In a randomized controlled trial of patients admitted for acute decompensated HF (ADHF), patients at high risk (≥33%) for 30-day hospital readmission and/or death were randomized to usual care or training with the HF-app. From August 2019 up until December 2020, 200 patients admitted to the hospital for ADHF were enrolled in the Risk-HF study. Of the 72 at high-risk, 36 (25 men; median age 81.5 years; 9.5 years of education; 15 in NYHA Class III at discharge) were randomized into the intervention arm and were offered education involving an HF-app. Whilst 26 (72%) could not use the HF-app, younger patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97; P < 0.01] and those with a higher education level (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.28; P = 0.03) were more likely to enrol. Of those enrolled, only 2 of 10 patients engaged and completed ≥70% of the program, and 6 of the remaining 8 who did not engage were readmitted. Conclusions Although AI-based education is promising in chronic conditions, our study provides a note of caution about the barriers to enrolment in critically ill, post-acute, and elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zisis et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (n=72). Avatar-based HF-app digital coach vs. Usual care was evaluated on Enrollment in the HF-app program (predicted by age) (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97, p=<0.01). The avatar-based HF-app digital coach experienced severe enrollment barriers (only 28% enrolled), with younger age (OR 0.89) and higher education (OR 1.58) significantly predicting successful enrollment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: