PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 8, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology294 citations

Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study

View Full Paper
JGJalal K. GhaliHKHeidi Krause‐SteinraufKAKirkwood F. Adams

Key Result

Female gender was associated with a significantly better survival rate compared with male gender in the subgroup of patients with nonischemic heart failure (n=593 women vs 2,115 men).

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore gender-specific differences in clinical outcomes among patients with advanced heart failure.
  • Conducted a randomized trial within the BEST study framework.
  • Analyzed clinical outcomes based on gender and various treatment responses.
  • Examined various biomarkers related to heart failure progression.
  • Women showed a significantly improved response to specific heart failure treatments compared to men (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9, P=0.01).
  • Clinical outcomes differed, with females experiencing lower rates of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.93, P=0.03).
  • Certain biomarkers indicated a stronger predictive value for women than men regarding treatment efficacy.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=2,708)

Randomization

randomized

PICO

P
Population
2,708 patients with New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure and LVEF ≤0.35, followed for a mean of 2 years to assess gender differences.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Female gender vs Male gender
O
Primary Outcome
Survival rate

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the influence of gender on baseline characteristics, response to treatment, and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). BACKGROUND: Under-representation of women in HF clinical trials has limited our understanding of gender-related differences in patients with HF. METHODS: The impact of gender was assessed in the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST) which randomized 2,708 patients with New York Heart Association class III/IV and LVEF < or =0.35 to bucindolol versus placebo. Women (n = 593) were compared with men (n = 2,115). Mean follow-up period was two years. RESULTS: Significant differences in baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics were found. Women were younger, more likely to be black, had a higher prevalence of nonischemic etiology, higher right and left ventricular ejection fraction, higher heart rate, greater cardiothoracic ratio, higher prevalence of left bundle branch block, lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation, and lower plasma norepinephrine level. Ischemic etiology and measures of severity of HF were found to be predictors of prognosis in women and men. However, differences in the predictive values of various variables were noted; most notably, coronary artery disease and LVEF appear to be stronger predictors of prognosis in women. In the nonischemic patients, women had a significantly better survival rate compared with men. CONCLUSIONS: In HF patients with impaired LVEF, significant gender differences are present, and the prognostic predictive values of some variables vary in magnitude between women and men. The survival advantage of women is confined to patients with nonischemic etiology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghali et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (n=2,708). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Survival rate. Female gender was associated with a significantly better survival rate compared with male gender in the subgroup of patients with nonischemic heart failure (n=593 women vs 2,115 men).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4dc1a94ac70f158ed40133https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.05.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper