Discussion note addresses identification of object-inductive methods and pool-determination challenges, offering solutions.
This note offers a response to Bakshi’s critical discussion of Schurz’s claim that meta-induction provides a non-circular justification of object-induction (induction at the object-level of events). Bakshi raises two issues: 1. The problem of identifying object-inductive methods, and 2. the problem of determining the pool of simultaneously accessible prediction methods. In this reply, a solution to the identification problem is offered, based on existing work. Concerning the problem of pool-determination, induction-independent criteria are proposed that justify disregarding Goodman-type methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerhard Schurz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: