Experimental study investigates atomization changes in hydraulic nozzles due to co-flow disturbance, informing operational practices.
Hydraulic nozzles are widely utilized for dust removal, cooling, and waste heat recovery in mining production. Nevertheless, the influence of co-flow disturbance on the atomization characteristics within the downstream region of droplet fields remains inadequately understood. In this study, three typical hydraulic nozzles were selected, and the atomization characteristics of the downstream region under different co-flow disturbance intensities were experimentally investigated. The results reveal that increasing co-flow disturbance velocity does not intensify the reduction in sauter mean diameter (SMD), but markedly reduces the dispersed phase fraction (DPF). Under four co-flow disturbance velocities (1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 m/s), the relative reduction rates of mean SMD are 6.77%, 3.27%, 4.42% and 2.60%, while those of mean DPF are 13.86%, 35.85%, 52.88%, and 61.86% (e.g., hollow-cone nozzle), respectively. The variation in SMD is achieved through the redistribution of cumulative volume among CV1, CV2, CV3, and CV4. As the velocity increases from 0 to 3 m/s, the mean SMD of the three hydraulic nozzles exhibits a decreasing trend, which can be directly attributed to the continuous increase in the total cumulative volume of CV1 and CV2, and the continuous decrease in those of CV3 and CV4. For the hollow-cone and solid square-cone nozzles, the SMD first decreases and then increases, with the turning point occurring at 3.0 m/s, consistent with the variation trend of cumulative volume fractions. In contrast, for the solid-cone nozzle, the SMD continues to decrease at velocities exceeding 3.0 m/s. This work provides both a fundamental understanding of atomization characteristics in the downstream region of hydraulic nozzles under co-flow disturbance and practical guidance for velocity control in mine spray systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: