Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates LLM-based ontology learning in various domains, indicating improvements in semantic alignment.
We present the extended NeOn-GPT pipeline, an LLM-powered, domain-agnostic ontology learning framework grounded in the NeOn methodology. The pipeline comprises two components: (i) ontology draft generation through multi-step prompting—covering requirement specification, competency questions, conceptualization, formal modeling, population, and documentation—and (ii) automated verification and repair through orchestrated calls to third-party tools complemented by LLM-suggested fixes. The extended pipeline introduces an explicit ontology reuse step to guide LLMs toward more consistent modeling decisions. We evaluate NeOn-GPT across four domains (Wine, Cheminformatics, Environmental Microbiology, and Sewer Networks) using both proprietary (GPT-4o) and open-source (Mistral, Llama-4, DeepSeek) models. Gold-standard alignment is assessed via structural metrics (class, property, and axiom profiles), lexical metrics, and semantic metrics based on sentence embeddings. Results show that LLMs consistently generate ontologies with rich relational structures and meaningful semantic alignment, with most entity and triple similarities falling in the 0.5–0.8 range. This study provides a comprehensive, cross-domain evaluation of NeOn-guided LLM ontology learning, clarifying its capabilities and limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fathallah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: