Evaluates botanical composition in tropical grasslands, suggesting frequency sampling as a complementary method.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the agreement of a frequency sampling method (FR) as a tool for species identification while measuring undisturbed sward height. Methods: The botanical composition of both grazing systems was evaluated during the pre-grazing and post-grazing periods using two methods: the Dry Weight Rank (DWR) and FR. A non-parametric Friedman test was applied to compare evaluation methods and grazing moments. Differences in detection frequencies between methods were assessed using McNemar’s test for paired binary data. Results: The evaluation method did not influence the relative abundance of the three most abundant plant species identified: U. decumbens, Paspalum genus, and Commelinaceae weeds. A high positive Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was observed between the two methods in U. decumbens, Paspalum genus, U. brizantha cv. Marandú, U. plantaginea, U. arrecta, and U. humidicola (CCC ≥ 0.70). We observed lower agreement for some functional groups, particularly Commelinaceae weeds (CCC = 0.38), narrow-leaf weeds (CCC = 0.46), and Cyperaceae weeds (CCC = 0.17). Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) between the chemical composition of leaves and the botanical composition estimated by the DWR revealed two significant canonical functions (p < 0.01), with canonical correlations of 0.692 and 0.478 for the first and second functions, respectively. When botanical composition estimated by the FR was used as a regressor for leaf chemical composition, three significant canonical functions (p < 0.01) were identified, with canonical correlations of 0.632, 0.529, and 0.425 for the first, second, and third functions, respectively. Conclusions: FR represents a practical and complementary approach for assessing botanical composition and plant diversity in heterogeneous tropical grasslands, particularly for the rapid monitoring of dominant species. However, lower agreement was observed for some low-abundance functional groups, indicating reduced FR sensitivity for certain plant types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echavarría et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: