Cross-sectional study examines accessory ossicle prevalence and symptomatic rates in young athletes, highlighting sports-related risks.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify prevalence patterns, symptomatic rates, and sport-specific risk factors associated with os trigonum, os subfibulare, and os subtibiale in young athletes presenting with ankle pain. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single-center sports medicine clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1167 young athletes (≤22 years) with ankle pain who underwent standardized weight-bearing radiographs. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Accessory ossicle type, age, physeal status, sport category, and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, symptomatic presentation, and surgical excision. RESULTS: Accessory ossicles were identified in 361 athletes (30.9%), comprising 406 total ossicles. Os trigonum was most prevalent (21.8%), followed by os subfibulare (9.9%) and os subtibiale (3.2%). Os trigonum was more frequent in athletes with closed physes, whereas os subfibulare and os subtibiale were more frequent in athletes with open physes (all P < 0.05). Among athletes with accessory ossicles, 37 (10.2%) were symptomatic, 73.0% were trauma-related, and 83.8% occurred in cutting/pivoting sports. Cutting/pivoting sports independently predicted symptomatic presentation (Odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.07-5.45; P = 0.034), whereas age, physeal status, and sex were not independently associated. CONCLUSIONS: Accessory ossicles showed distinct prevalence patterns across skeletal maturity groups, but symptomatic presentation was independently associated with cutting/pivoting sports rather than age or skeletal maturity. These findings may help clinicians assess the potential clinical relevance of accessory ossicles identified in young athletes with ankle pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakoda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: