The paper demonstrates a pluralist race theory can effectively tackle racial health disparities, indicating a new approach in bioethics.
Contemporary work in bioethics presupposes a monistic view of race and a structuralist or polysemous view of racism. We aim to show that these received views are mistaken if the aim is to solve the racial health disparities problem. We argue that the theories that best enable us to solve the racial health disparities problem are a pluralist race theory and a virtue-theoretic account of racism, because these theories are the best in terms of providing relevant accuracy and scope, causal explanatory power, non-superfluous ontological complexity, and practical utility for the task at hand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peebles et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: