Addendum clarifies transition classifications for governed composition, suggesting improved analysis frameworks.
A6 Composition Transition Predicate Addendum v0.1.4 defines an explicit transition-classification predicate for A6 governed composition. The addendum separates CONTINUE, EXIT, SPLIT, HOLD_OR_FREEZE, and DISSOLVE by the preservation or loss of a unique lawful successor composition. It formalizes A6 transition analysis around standing, role, obligation, quorum, witness lineage, memory precedence, authority boundaries, temporal window state, and successor-claim compatibility. This v0.1.4 revision closes the predicate-review cycle for the draft addendum. It incorporates b-layer semantic review findings from v0.1.1 through v0.1.3, including classification of lawful successor predicates, successor-claim incompatibility, successor-space exhaustion, temporal WINDOWED predicates, witness namespace canon/projection rules, and actor/role departure classification. The package includes the canonical Markdown source, academic PDF rendering, SHA256 checksums, b-layer advisory review records, and integration hash-verification records. The parent DOI-published A6 artifact remains unchanged. This record is a bounded addendum / transition-predicate clarification and does not replace, silently amend, or supersede the parent A6 DOI artifact. No conformance claim, product-certification claim, deployment-readiness claim, legal advice claim, personhood claim, or safety proof is made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Kotov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: