Background:The initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic served as a global stress test for emergency medical systems.This study establishes a historic baseline capturing (1) the burden of occupational injuries among emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in Ghana, and (2) factors associated with their knowledge of COVID-19 patient transport protocols during the initial pandemic response (June-August 2020).Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 413 EMTs from 59 ambulance stations across 7 regions.Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, occupational injury history (past 12 months), general occupational health knowledge/ attitudes, and COVID-19-specific knowledge and preparedness.Occupational injury burden was analyzed descriptively.The primary analytical outcome was adequate knowledge of COVID-19 patient transport protocols.Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associated factors.Results: Of 400 respondents (96.9%), a high burden of self-reported work-related injuries was documented: back pain (82.5%) and sprains/strains (47.5%).While 77.0% had adequate COVID-19 protocol knowledge, only 45.9% reported that recommended personal protective equipment was available.EMTs demonstrated good general occupational health knowledge (71.2%) and positive attitude (77.8%).In adjusted analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-5.78),good general OHS knowledge (AOR, 4.20; 95% CI, 2.41-7.29),and positive attitude towards OHS (AOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.06-3.42)were significantly associated with adequate COVID-19 knowledge.Secondary and diploma education were associated with lower odds.The model demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84).Conclusion: Within the 7 regions studied, this baseline suggests potential systemic challenges in pre-hospital care, including a knowledge-resource gap and high musculoskeletal injury rates.Findings indicate that resilient emergency medical systems depend on strong foundational OHS, equitable training, and reliable supply chains.This baseline offers a reference point for future evaluations of occupational health among EMTs in similar contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: