Key result
Tissue Doppler imaging-derived Aa-IV intervals correlated significantly better with fetal ECG PR intervals (R2 = 0.15, p < 0.0001, mean bias 8.0 ms) than did pulse-wave Doppler-derived AV intervals.
Why the study?
Does tissue Doppler imaging correlate better with fetal ECG PR intervals than pulse-wave Doppler in assessing fetal atrioventricular time intervals?
Cohort (n=131)
No
Does tissue Doppler imaging correlate better with fetal ECG PR intervals than pulse-wave Doppler in assessing fetal atrioventricular time intervals?
Effect estimate: R2 = 0.15
p-value: p=<0.0001
Tissue Doppler imaging-derived Aa-IV intervals track fetal ECG PR intervals more closely than pulse-wave Doppler methods, establishing it as the preferred ultrasound method for assessing fetal AV conduction.
TDI may refine fetal AV interval assessment; leaves open prospective validation before changing practice.
OBJECTIVE: To establish gestational age-specific reference values of normal fetal atrioventricular (AV) time interval by spectral tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and pulse-wave Doppler (PD) methods, and to assess their correlation with signal-averaged fetal PR intervals (ECG). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary centre for fetal cardiology. PATIENTS AND MEASURES: 131 pregnant women between 14 and 42 weeks' gestation underwent 196 fetal echocardiograms and 158 fetal ECG studies. TDI-derived AV intervals were measured as the intervals from atrial contraction (Aa) to isovolumic contraction (IV) and from Aa to ventricular systole (Sa) at the right ventricular free wall. PD-derived AV intervals were measured from simultaneous left ventricular inflow/outflow (in/out) and superior vena cava/aorta (V/AO) recordings. RESULTS: Measurements were possible by ECG in 61%, by TDI in 100%, by in/out in 100% and by V/AO in 97% of examinations. Aa-IV correlated significantly better with PR intervals (y = 0.67x + 38.29, R(2) = 0.15, p < 0.0001, mean bias 8.0 ms) than did in/out (R(2) = 0.10, p = 0.002, bias 18.7 ms) and V/AO (R(2) = 0.06, p = 0.02, bias 12.4 ms). Gestational age and AV intervals were positively correlated with all imaging modalities (R(2) = 0.19-0.31, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed the feasibility of fetal AV interval measurements by TDI, and established gestational age-specific reference data. TDI-derived Aa-IV intervals track ECG PR intervals more closely than PD-derived AV intervals and thus should be used as the ultrasound method of choice in assessing fetal AV conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nii et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Normal fetal cardiac anatomy, function and rhythm (n=131). Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) vs. Pulse-wave Doppler (PD) and fetal ECG was evaluated on Correlation of TDI-derived Aa-IV intervals with ECG PR intervals (R2 = 0.15, p=<0.0001). Tissue Doppler imaging-derived Aa-IV intervals correlated significantly better with fetal ECG PR intervals (R2 = 0.15, p < 0.0001, mean bias 8.0 ms) than did pulse-wave Doppler-derived AV intervals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: