Key result
Aspirin resistance is not associated with hemocompatibility-related adverse events in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether aspirin response influences hemocompatibility-related adverse event incidence and if aspirin sensitivity changes over time in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
Does aspirin resistance affect the incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients?
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
No
Does aspirin resistance affect the incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients?
Aspirin sensitivity status does not appear to correlate with hemocompatibility-related adverse events in HeartMate 3 patients, supporting emerging evidence that questions the utility of routine aspirin in this population.
Aspirin resistance testing should not yet guide management in HeartMate 3 recipients; hypothesis-generating for aspirin's role and prospective trials needed.
Background: Patients with a HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) typically receive anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The HM3 has shown a marked reduction in hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) like stroke, bleeding, and pump thrombosis. This study evaluated whether aspirin (ASA) response influences HRAE incidence and if ASA sensitivity changes over time in HM3 recipients. Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study included 32 HM3 patients (age: 59.0 ± 10.0 years, 15.6% female). ASA sensitivity was assessed twice using the VerifyNow assay, with ASA resistance defined by ASA reactivity units (ARU) > 550. The primary endpoint was HRAE incidence in ASA responders vs. non-responders over two consecutive follow-ups; the secondary endpoint was temporal changes in ASA resistance. Results: At the first follow-up, 13 (40.6%) patients were ASA-resistant, and 8 (28.6%) were resistant at the second follow-up, without significant change (p = 0.22). ASA non-responders and responders had similar ASA doses and baseline characteristics. No significant difference in HRAE incidence was found between ASA non-responders and responders (0.0% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.14), and no additional HRAEs occurred during follow-up. Conclusions: ASA resistance varied considerably among HM3 patients without significant temporal changes, and the demonstrated excellent hemocompatibility supports recent evidence that ASA may have a limited role in the antithrombotic regimen for HM3 recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asadi et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients (n=32). Aspirin resistance (VerifyNow ASA reactivity units ≥550) vs. Aspirin responsiveness (VerifyNow ASA reactivity units <550) was evaluated on Incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) (p=0.14). Aspirin resistance did not significantly impact the incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients compared to aspirin responders (0.0% vs. 15.8%, p=0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: