Key result
Intramyocardial Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 gene transfer shows safety with 0 adverse events and early angina improvement.
Why the study?
Does direct myocardial injection of Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 improve safety and ischemia in patients with clinically significant coronary artery disease?
Does direct myocardial injection of Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 improve safety and ischemia in patients with clinically significant coronary artery disease?
Direct myocardial injection of a VEGF-expressing adenovirus vector is well tolerated and may improve angina in patients with severe coronary artery disease, warranting Phase II trials.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic angiogenesis, a new experimental strategy for the treatment of vascular insufficiency, uses the administration of mediators known to induce vascular development in embryogenesis to induce neovascularization of ischemic adult tissues. This report summarizes a phase I clinical experience with a gene-therapy strategy that used an E1(-)E3(-) adenovirus (Ad) gene-transfer vector expressing human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 121 cDNA (Ad(GV)VEGF121.10) to induce therapeutic angiogenesis in the myocardium of individuals with clinically significant coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 was administered to 21 individuals by direct myocardial injection into an area of reversible ischemia either as an adjunct to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (group A, n=15) or as sole therapy via a minithoracotomy (group B, n=6). There was no evidence of systemic or cardiac-related adverse events related to vector administration. In both groups, coronary angiography and stress sestamibi scan assessment of wall motion 30 days after therapy suggested improvement in the area of vector administration. All patients reported improvement in angina class after therapy. In group B, in which gene transfer was the only therapy, treadmill exercise assessment suggested improvement in most individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The data are consistent with the concept that direct myocardial administration of Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 to individuals with clinically significant coronary artery disease appears to be well tolerated, and initiation of phase II evaluation of this therapy is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosengart et al. (1999) studied clinically significant coronary artery disease (n=21). Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 was evaluated on Systemic or cardiac-related adverse events and improvement in wall motion/angina class. Direct myocardial administration of Ad(GV)VEGF121.10 in 21 patients was well tolerated with 0 reported systemic or cardiac-related adverse events and suggested improvements in angina class at 30 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: