Poster-style article demonstrates nanoprecipitate characterisation in NiTi and aluminium alloys, highlighting spatial distributions and mechanisms of formation.
Nanoscale precipitates are central to the functional and mechanical performance of many advanced alloys, yet their characteristics and spatial distributions can be directly resolved only by electron microscopy. In this poster‐style article, focused ion beam‐prepared TEM lamellae are used to provide a microscopy‐focused overview of nanoprecipitate populations in two representative precipitate‐controlled systems: a Ni‐rich NiTi shape memory alloy and a multicomponent Al‐Ce‐(Er,Sc,Zr) aluminium alloy. In the NiTi alloy, a short heat treatment at 560°C for 1 min produced a recovered, subgrained matrix containing lenticular Ni 4 Ti 3 precipitates with nanoscale dimensions. Representative TEM observations show precipitates located within the matrix and near dislocation‐rich regions and subgrain boundaries, suggesting a local spatial association with the deformation substructure. In the Al‐Ce‐(Er,Sc,Zr) alloy, TEM analysis of aged samples shows coarse Al 11 Ce 3 intermetallic phases within an Al matrix containing fine nanoscale precipitates consistent with L1 2 ‐Al 3 (Er,Sc,Zr) type precipitates. Selected‐area electron diffraction (SAED) confirms the ordered L1 2 structure through superlattice reflections. Together, these case studies illustrate how FIB‐TEM workflows enable direct visualisation of precipitate morphology, coherency, and spatial distribution across distinct alloy systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golsorkhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: