Case study explores pre-service teachers’ strategies and ethical perspectives on generative AI, indicating the need for better training.
With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and its applications in teacher education, it is essential to understand pre-service teachers’ perceptions and strategies for using GenAI and to explore their learning about AI ethics from an epistemological perspective. This involves integrating GenAI as a non-human epistemic agent into knowledge-building environments with a focus on human-AI collaboration. The participants were 22 pre-service teachers. Using a case study approach, we examined how pre-service teachers engaged with the benefits and limitations of GenAI and the strategies they adopted when using it in a knowledge-building environment. Thematic analysis also found three ethical reasoning patterns, including critical use of GenAI, algorithmic aversion, and cognitive offloading, during pre-service teachers’ AI ethics learning process. The findings highlight an epistemological tension that arises when GenAI participates as a non-human epistemic agent during the knowledge-building process. Based on these findings, we propose a professional development program to help pre-service teachers design and implement GenAI in knowledge-building teaching practice. The study has implications for educators, engineers, and policymakers seeking to design and integrate GenAI effectively and ethically in the AI-supported knowledge era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: