Retrospective cross-sectional study evaluates charge variations and trends for posterior cervical fusion in ASCs, indicating economic implications.
Study Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Objective To evaluate national trends in utilization and inflation-adjusted charges for single-level posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) performed in hospital-owned ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Methods The National Ambulatory Surgery Sample was queried from 2016 to 2022 for adult ASC encounters with CPT 22600, corresponding to single-level posterior cervical fusion. Survey-weighted methods estimated national volumes and modeled adjusted charges using generalized linear models. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results A weighted total of 8,609 single-level PCDF procedures were performed in hospital-owned ASCs from 2016 to 2022 (unweighted n = 6,505). Annual volume increased from 577 cases in 2016 to 3,307 cases in 2021 before declining to 1,586 cases in 2022. Median inflation-adjusted charges rose from $41,697 in 2016 to $69,255 in 2022 ( P < 0.001). Adjusted mean charges varied significantly by payer and region, with higher charges for private insurance versus Medicaid ($62,621 vs $50,095, P < 0.001) and for the West versus the Northeast ($93,278 vs $19,847, P < 0.001), based on adequate regional sample sizes (unweighted n = 653 and n = 1,557, respectively). Medicare demonstrated the fastest annual charge growth, higher than Medicaid (+10.35%/year, P = 0.004), private (+12.31%/year, P < 0.001), and Other (+11.87%/year, P < 0.001). Conclusions Outpatient PCDF adoption in ASCs rose sharply from 2016 to 2021 with persistent, pronounced regional and payer-associated charge variation. These findings suggest that geographic pricing ecosystems and payer dynamics are key drivers of outpatient PCDF economics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: