Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Retrospective observational study compares relapse outcomes in bipolar disorder using different aripiprazole injection regimens, suggesting feasibility of two-injection starts.
Objective The standard one-injection start (OIS) regimen of aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) requires a 14-day oral overlap, which may present practical challenges in routine care. This study evaluated whether the accelerated two-injection start (TIS) strategy, which eliminates oral overlap, affects 1-year real-world outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder (BD).Methods This retrospective observational study included 132 inpatients with Bipolar I disorder hospitalized for an acute manic episode (OIS: n = 88; TIS: n = 44) initiated on AOM between January and December 2024. Primary outcomes were 1-year rehospitalization and emergency room (ER) visits. Exploratory analyses examined relapse-related outcomes, timing of initiation, and baseline illness severity.Results Baseline and acute-phase characteristics were comparable between groups. Multivariable models confirmed the TIS regimen did not significantly increase the hazard of 1-year rehospitalization (aHR: 0.71, p = 0.435) or ER visits (aHR: 0.76, p = 0.378) compared to OIS. Among patients who relapsed, TIS was associated with fewer recurrent ER visits (p = 0.031) and a longer time to first ER visit (93.5 vs. 40.0 days). Exploratory analyses showed numerically lower ER utilization rates for the TIS regimen when initiated early (≤7 days) and among patients with higher baseline illness severity.Conclusions The TIS regimen appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to OIS in BD, without compromising 1-year clinical outcomes or increasing adjunctive medication use. Exploratory findings suggested a potential trend toward a less intensive relapse course and delayed acute psychiatric service utilization among patients receiving TIS. Given the exploratory nature of these analyses, these observations require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Kurt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: