This article examines regulatory reform for community networks in Nigeria, revealing limitations of current frameworks.
The market liberalisation model governing telecommunications regulation since the 1980s has failed to deliver universal connectivity in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Community networks, which are telecommunications infrastructure deployed and governed by local communities as a shared resource, have emerged as a credible institutional alternative. Yet regulatory frameworks designed exclusively for commercial operators offer no viable pathway for community-based, non-commercial provision. This article examines this structural mismatch in Nigeria, where the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) is reforming its regulatory instruments through a General Authorisation Framework, a Spectrum Roadmap for 2026–2030, and a review of the National Telecommunications Policy. Drawing on Elinor Ostrom’s institutional theory, a doctrinal analysis of the Nigerian Communications Act 2003, and comparative study of Kenya, Mexico, and South Africa, the article argues that the NCC’s reforms replicate market-oriented assumptions and remain structurally inadequate for community networks. It advances design principles for a purpose-built pathway achievable without primary legislative amendment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Temitope Lawal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: