Key result
Concomitant cervical artery dissection is linked to ~6-fold higher stroke risk in SCAD.
Why the study?
Patients with combined coronary and cervical arterial dissection may have widespread arterial abnormalities and worse outcomes, necessitating better risk stratification and identification of risk factors.
Cohort (n=1,380)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant stroke vigilance in SCAD with CvAD; extends multi-territory dissection data but remains hypothesis-generating.
Background: Patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events, including dissection in other arterial territories such as cervical arteries. Those with combined coronary and cervical arterial dissection (CACAD) may have more widespread arterial abnormalities and worse outcomes, underscoring the need for better risk stratification and personalized care. Objective: This study examined the prevalence of cervical artery dissection (CvAD) in patients diagnosed with SCAD, evaluated potential risk factors for developing CvAD, and assessed their impact on clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, SCAD recurrence, and stroke. The goal was to enhance risk stratification by identifying SCAD patients at increased risk for CvAD. Design: In this retrospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with SCAD between 2018 and 2024 across Mayo Clinic sites were identified using ICD-10 codes. Manual chart review confirmed CvAD diagnoses. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of CvAD. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used to compare risk factors and comorbidities. Univariate screening and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors of CvAD. Results: Among 1380 patients with SCAD, 131 (9.5%) had CvAD. The median follow-up was 2.02 years (IQR: 1.1–5.2 years). All CvAD diagnoses were identified after the index SCAD event through systematic post-SCAD vascular imaging. The mean age was similar between groups (51.5 ± 11.3 years in CACAD vs. 50.9 ± 10.7 years in SCAD-only, p = 0.540), and the majority were female (93.9% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.529). Multivariable regression identified extremity arterial dissection (OR: 8.13, 95% CI: 3.41–19.36, p < 0.001), fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) (OR: 7.52, 95% CI: 4.67–12.10, p < 0.001), connective tissue disorders (CTDs) (OR: 6.85, 95% CI: 2.35–19.98, p < 0.001), and anxiety (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.01–2.81, p = 0.044) as significant predictors of CvAD. CvAD was a strong independent predictor of stroke (OR: 6.37, 95% CI: 2.93–13.87, p < 0.001). Mortality and SCAD recurrence did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Patients with CACAD demonstrate a systemic vascular phenotype with significantly higher rates of FMD, connective tissue disease, extremity arterial dissection, and stroke. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive vascular screening and individualized monitoring in at-risk SCAD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bcharah et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) (n=1,380). Cervical artery dissection (CvAD) vs. SCAD without cervical artery dissection was evaluated on Stroke (OR 6.37, 95% CI 2.93-13.87, p=<0.001). Concomitant cervical artery dissection in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke (OR 6.37).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: