Tests a novel method for improving memory retention in analog devices, indicating intrinsic noise can be harnessed positively.
On analog neuromorphic hardware, intrinsic device noise is normally an accuracy tax. We ask whether it can instead be made to consolidate memories. We cast per-synapse consolidation as a Doob h-transform: condition each weight’s stochastic dynamics on the event of never crossing a memory-critical barrier around its consolidated value. The conditioned diffusion acquires an extra drift σ2 ∂w log h — a restoring force toward the memory that is amplified by the noise variance itself, and diverges at the barrier. We are explicit about what is and is not new. The anchored-consolidation drift−s(w−µ) that our rule also contains is not ours: it is the small-noise limit of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck Adaptation [Garcia Fernandez et al., 2024], the variance-scaled anchor of MESU [Bonnet et al., 2025], and the Fisher penalty of EWC [Kirkpatrick et al., 2017], and we surrender it as a re-derivation. Our claim is the conjunction of (a) the Doob barrier-conditioning as a synaptic rule — to our knowledge unclaimed; every h-transform use we found is generative modeling or Schr¨odinger bridges, none synaptic — and (b) a falsifiable, load-bearing prediction: increasing the intrinsic noise non-monotonically improves sequential-task retention, an inverted-U these anchored-drift methods cannot produce. We pre-registered this as a go/no-go gate and it passes: on single-head Split-MNIST (8 seeds) the barrier-conditioned rule lifts retention by 10.9 percentage points at an interior optimum σ∗ = 0.02 (paired Wilcoxon p= 0.004 vs. zero noise and vs. high noise), while the matched OU, EWC and MESU anchors are monotone-decreasing in noise. Ablating the conditioning removes the effect; the optimum tracks the barrier; the inverted-U survives a device-faithful BrainScaleS-2 noise model (colored, multiplicative, fixed-pattern, 6-bit) and reproduces on a second task stream. It also survives the hardware-faithful realization in which the noise enters the forward pass (the analog MAC) rather than the weights, with the retention optimum tunable to a device’s few-percent intrinsic noise. At its optimum the rule is the strongest rehearsal-free consolidation method we test — matching MESU and significantly beating OU and EWC; plain replay, which stores data, scores higher but exhibits none of the mechanism. We further measure the intrinsic noise on real BrainScaleS-2 silicon (chip hxcube7fpga3chip61 1): it is additive and trial-to-trial-independent, with a coefficient of variation up to 12.0% that the chip’s num sends knob averages as ≈1/√N — the benign noise class the mechanism needs, at a reachable amplitude — and the inverted-U survives an emulation calibrated to it. Finally we run the rule on real BrainScaleS-2 silicon with the chip in the training loop: its own intrinsic noise, steered by the barrier-conditioning, retains a prior task 15.6 points better than the matched unconditioned control at matched average accuracy — a stability-plasticity shift, not a net-accuracy win (single seed, one operating point; retention measured, energy modelled). Within these limits the mechanism reframes analog noise from a tax into a consolidation dividend that a von-Neumann accelerator must spend energy to generate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G W O Howe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: