Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores co-regulatory methods to enhance enforceability of technology rules in international trade agreements, emphasizing U.S.–China relations.
Co-regulatory approaches play a pivotal role in enhancing the legitimacy and enforceability of domestic legislation, particularly in the realm of high-technology regulations. While well-acknowledged in domestic contexts, the application of co-regulation to international law-making and the enforcement of international trade law has received limited scholarly attention. This article addresses this research gap by examining the potential of co-regulatory approaches to facilitate the making and enforcement of technology-related provisions in emerging regional trade agreements (RTA). It draws insights from bilateral trade disputes between the USA and China, with a specific focus on the enforcement of technology transfer rules and intellectual property-related chapters under the Phase One US-China Economic and Trade Agreement. The study suggests that the co-regulatory approach offers an effective analytical framework for understanding and addressing challenges in enforcing RTAs/bilateral trade agreements. Beyond the context of future enforcement of US–China trade arrangements, it also offers broader insights for states seeking to strengthen the legitimacy and enforceability of technology-related rules in international legal agreements through more participatory, adaptive, and institutionally credible governance design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: