Explores a question-based ethical framework for locator devices in dementia care, suggesting balanced stakeholder values.
Background Locator devices are increasingly being used to help manage wandering among people living with dementia. While these technologies can be beneficial, they also raise significant ethical questions. These ethical questions are faced in both the development and use of these devices. Objective The aim of this study is to develop and present a question-based ethical framework that can guide both the use and the development of locator devices in dementia care, ensuring that stakeholder needs and values are balanced effectively. Methods A four-step process informed the framework’s creation: (1) literature collection (systematic searches of empirical, normative, and development-focused research were conducted); (2) content analysis (an inductive qualitative analysis of collected literature identified key ethical concerns, arguments, and stakeholder perspectives); (3) iterative framework drafting (insights were translated into open-ended questions and refined through regular team discussions); and (4) stakeholder consultation (feedback from health professionals, older adults, family members, developers, and ethicists was used to refine and finalize the framework). Results The resulting framework is organized around 3 themes—vision, process, and impact—each containing guiding questions that encourage dialogical reflection and decision-making. For “use,” these questions help care communities clarify goals, define processes, and assess outcomes. For “development,” they aid developers in articulating device objectives, anticipating risks, and aligning product features with end-user values. Conclusions By providing guiding questions that can be adapted to local needs and contexts, this framework fosters a more inclusive, transparent, and ethically accountable approach to developing and using locator devices in dementia care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: