Review highlights advances in materials, design, and circuitry for gyroscopes in extreme environments, suggesting improvements for future use.
Severe shocks and vibrations are common in industrial settings (such as oil drilling at 200–300 °C and heavy machinery); high-temperature piezoelectric gyroscopes’ solid-state architecture provides remarkable shock and vibration tolerance as well as great reliability. This review covers the most recent advances in the creation of high-temperature piezoelectric gyroscopes from three angles: materials, structural design, and circuit design. First, it emphasises how optimising microstructures can greatly improve the materials’ temperature stability (e.g., PZT with d33 = 562 pC/N and LiNbO3 with Curie temperature ~1210 °C) and piezoelectric coefficient; second, it examines the structural design of piezoelectric gyroscopes based on MEMS/NEMS technology (such as disc-type, ring-type, and beam-type), showing that optimising resonance frequency matching and modal isolation techniques greatly improves the gyroscope’s zero-bias stability (down to 5°/h) and immunity to interference; and third, it summarises the efficacy of optimisation techniques like temperature self-compensation circuit design and structural symmetry design. According to research, problems like high-temperature material ageing (e.g., degradation above 120 °C for silicon-based devices) and the difficulty of system integration continue to limit current technology; in the future, performance bottlenecks will need to be removed through advancements in cross-scale manufacturing technologies and intelligent sensor fusion design. From a multidisciplinary standpoint, this study offers theoretical references and technical recommendations for the industrial use of high-temperature piezoelectric gyroscopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: