Explores breath-hold durations impacting image quality in hypermetabolic lung nodules, suggesting clinical feasibility.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the effects of different breath-holding times (20, 18 and 15 s) on PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) image quality and metabolic parameters of hypermetabolic lung nodules. We hope that our findings will elucidate the clinical feasibility of short-duration breath-hold PET imaging. RESULTS: Compared to free-breathing PET group, all breath-hold groups showed significantly higher tumour-to-background ratio but lower signal-to-noise ratio (all P < 0.05). Importantly, the 18 s breath-hold group demonstrated overall image quality, fusion scores and contrast-to-noise ratio comparable to those of the 20-s group, without statistically significant differences (all P > 0.05). Moreover, the 18-s group exhibited a more favourable signal-to-noise ratio profile than the 15-s group. Metabolically, all breath-hold scans significantly increased maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and mean SUV while reducing metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis relative to free-breathing (P < 0.05). Notably, there were no significant differences in key quantitative metrics, including maximum SUV, peak SUV, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, among the three breath-hold groups. The consistency of peak SUV across groups further supports its reliability as a robust parameter under reduced acquisition times. CONCLUSION: The 18-s breath-hold protocol is a valid clinical alternative to the 20-s acquisition, offering comparable image quality and metabolic data while superior efficiency and patient tolerability, making it an ideal choice for routine practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: