Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores social intermediation processes that restore reflexivity in severely marginalized communities, suggesting new frameworks for intervention.
The literature on social intermediaries (SIs) highlights their role in alleviating poverty and promoting market inclusion in emerging economies through interventions that counterbalance pressures from formal and informal institutions. However, this research centers on interplays between intermediaries and institutions, implicitly assuming that beneficiaries (BENs) reject their condition of poverty and retain a minimally functioning capacity for reflexive agency, supporting engagement with such interventions. In contrast, our study of slums and rural communities in Kenya and Sierra Leone examines social intermediation amid conditions in which extreme marginalization has fractured BENs’ reflexive capacity, leaving them unable to orient toward purposive action. Using a critical realist relational lens, we develop a process model in which social intermediation unfolds through interdependent morpho-regenerative processes—institutional shielding, relational accompaniment, and entrepreneurial empowerment—that create prolonged protective spaces against oppressive pressures and repair reflexivity gradually until BENs can sustain it on their own. We theorize morpho-regeneration as a custodial practice of “with-in” intervention that restores individual capacities for social and economic participation, enabling more conventional outside-in and inside-up intermediation approaches. Our study offers new insights into the relational dimensions of poverty alleviation and their connection to community-level dynamics, with relevance to other contexts where agency is severely destabilized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sottini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: