Preprint reviews body measurement indices, revealing information loss in their design, suggesting a need for common standards.
This preprint reviews anthropometric indices and related body-measurement methods as scalar mappings from measured body variables to numerical outputs. It analyzes BMI as a dimensional reduction based on body mass and height that omits transverse body geometry, producing information loss: physically distinct body configurations may share the same scalar value. The article compares historically important anthropometric formulas, body-shape indices, body-composition equations, and instrumental methods with respect to their input variables, mathematical form, physical dimensions, geometric degrees of freedom, and intended use. It argues that the proliferation of anthropometric indices reflects the absence of a common physical referent linking body mass, body volume, shape, and density. This work is the opening manuscript in the research series Physics of the Human Body. Series repository: Open Science Framework, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ENAUQ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popov Eugene (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: