Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares the ability of Sentinel-2 and WorldView-3 to map iron minerals in mining areas, suggesting Sentinel-2 is more effective.
Mining of sulfide-rich deposits enhances the oxidation of sulfide minerals, generating acid mine drainage (AMD) characterized by high sulphate and dissolved metal concentrations and the formation of secondary iron minerals (hematite, goethite, and jarosite). As these minerals display diagnostic features in the visible–near-infrared (VNIR) region, multispectral satellite data provide a cost-effective means of monitoring. Here, the performances of Sentinel-2 and the VNIR bands from WorldView-3 are assessed and compared for the mapping and discrimination of secondary iron minerals in Sierra Minera de Cartagena–La Unión (SE Spain). Both datasets were analyzed using a band ratio and a parabola fitting technique focused on reflectance maxima. Band ratio results were interpreted as broad spectral patterns rather than definitive mineral identifications. Mineral maps were validated by applying X-ray diffraction on 74 surface soil samples. Although both sensors were able to reproduce the main spatial patterns of iron mineral distribution, Sentinel-2 data better discriminated hematite, goethite, and jarosite, especially when using the parabola fitting approach, whereas WorldView-3 VNIR data distinguished mainly hematite from the combined goethite–jarosite group. The better performance of Sentinel-2 is attributed to its red-edge and near-infrared band configuration. These findings indicate that freely available Sentinel-2 imagery can support systematic monitoring of oxidation processes in mining environments and contribute to environmental risk assessment in degraded landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: