Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduces Judsan constants, demonstrates convergence, and suggests transcendental properties in mathematics.
I introduce a new family of mathematical constants, the Judsan constants J_m, defined by J_m = Σₙ₌₁^∞ τ(n) (1/2)_n / (m+1)_n · 1/n, where τ(n) is the Ramanujan tau function. Using Deligne's bound |τ(n)| ≤ d(n) n11/2, I prove that the series converges absolutely for all m ≥ 7 and diverges for m ≤ 6. This establishes a new family of well-defined constants arising from the modular discriminant. I provide verified numerical evaluations:- J_7 ≈ 0.01320683...- J_8 ≈ 0.01749424...- J_9 ≈ 0.01813287...- J_10 ≈ 0.01780076...- J_15 ≈ 0.01507731... Using PSLQ with 80-digit precision via the mpmath library, I find no algebraic relations up to degree 5 for any J_m. I also find no linear relations among {J_7, J_8, J_9, J_10, J_15} and no matches to known constants (π, e, γ, ζ(3), Catalan, etc.). This provides strong numerical evidence that the Judsan constants are transcendental and linearly independent over Q. I further conjecture that the generating function F_m(q) = Σₙ₌₁^∞ τ(n) (1/2)_n / (m+1)_n q^n is a mock modular form of weight 12 with shadow Δ(q), the weight-12 modular discriminant. Numerical transformation tests are consistent with this conjecture. This work bridges polylogarithm theory, modular forms, and experimental number theory. The paper includes a rigorous convergence proof, Mellin transform analysis, and extensive computational evidence for deep arithmetic conjectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judsan Niyakaran (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: