Develops a vision-based framework for material classification in sustainable construction, indicating significant advancements in quality control.
Purpose Proper visual identification of construction materials is critical for automated quality control in sustainable soil-based three-dimensional (3D) printing. Misidentification may compromise both structural performance and environmental goals. Non-contact material verification methods are needed to complement the rapid growth of sustainable extrusion-based construction. The purpose of this study is to build a vision-based framework to distinguish soil-printed elements from other similar-looking cement-printed and nonsoil-printed materials. Design/methodology/approach A data set of 3D-printed construction elements was created and expanded to six variants: Red, Green and Blue (RGB) and Grayscale, besides their processed and augmented versions. Multiple models were trained using a single ResNet50 backbone architecture, each for a different data set variant. An 80/20 train-validation split across 40 epochs was used in backbone transfer learning. Model performance was measured by accuracy, confusion matrices, class-wise precision, recall and F1-score. Findings Retaining RGB color significantly improved classification, achieving a validation accuracy of 86.12%. Grayscale variants remained competitive due to well-preserved textures, while offline data augmentation negatively affected performance in both color spaces. Error analysis showed that gray-toned soil and similarly colored cement samples continued to confuse each other. Originality/value This paper presents an early systematic analysis of preprocessing methods for vision-based material classification in soil-based 3D-printed construction. It develops a replicable computer vision workflow and suggests best preprocessing practices relevant to automated inspection and quality control in sustainable construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khandare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: