Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains among the most complex procedures in interventional cardiology, with variable technical success and heterogeneous long-term outcomes. Conventional angiographic scores such as J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO provide only modest predictive accuracy and neglect critical patient and operator-related factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools, capable of integrating multimodal data and offering enhanced diagnostic, procedural, and prognostic insights. Methods: We performed a structured narrative review of the literature between January 2010 and September 2025 using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed original research, reviews, or meta-analyses addressing AI/ML applications in CTO PCI across imaging, procedural planning, and prognostic modeling. A total of 330 records were screened, and 33 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Results: AI applications in diagnostic imaging achieved high accuracy, with deep learning on coronary CT angiography yielding AUCs up to 0.87 for CTO detection, and IVUS/OCT segmentation demonstrating reproducibility > 95% compared with expert analysis. In procedural prediction, ML algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) outperformed traditional scores, achieving AUCs of 0.73–0.82 versus 0.62–0.70 for J-CTO/PROGRESS-CTO. Prognostic models, particularly CatBoost and neural networks, achieved AUCs of 0.83–0.84 for 5-year mortality in large registries (n ≈ 3200), surpassing regression-based methods. Importantly, comorbidities and functional status emerged as stronger predictors than procedural strategy. Future Directions: AI integration holds promise for real-time guidance in the catheterization laboratory, robotics-assisted PCI, federated learning to overcome data privacy barriers, and multimodality fusion incorporating imaging, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes. However, clinical adoption requires prospective multicenter validation, harmonization of endpoints, bias mitigation, and regulatory oversight. Conclusions: AI represents a paradigm shift in CTO PCI, providing superior accuracy over conventional risk models and enabling patient-centered risk prediction. With continued advances in federated learning, multimodality integration, and explainable AI, translation from research to routine practice appears within reach.
Doktorova et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: