Key result
Prosthetic valve strands are ~3.5 times more prevalent in suspected cardioembolic events versus valve dysfunction.
Why the study?
Prosthetic mitral valve strands had uncertain clinical significance, reports of aortic prosthesis strands were lacking, and data linking strands to cardioembolic events were limited.
Population
214 transesophageal echocardiographic studies in patients with prosthetic valves
Comparison
Suspected cardioembolic event vs suspected valve dysfunction
Design
Single-center retrospective observational study
Authors
Loading...
Prosthetic valve strands may warrant TEE scrutiny in embolism suspects; observational data leaves open causality and management implications.
Observational (n=214)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 53% vs 15%
p-value: p=0.0001
Orsinelli et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Suspected cardioembolic event or valve dysfunction in patients with a valve prosthesis (n=214). Suspected cardioembolic event vs. Suspected valve dysfunction was evaluated on Prevalence of prosthetic valve strands (p=0.0001). Prosthetic valve strands were significantly more prevalent in patients evaluated for a suspected cardioembolic event compared to those evaluated for suspected valve dysfunction (53% vs 15%, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: