Event-level analysis measures the pace of action in the UN Security Council, highlighting workflow impacts.
This paper examines how the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) processes agenda items by measuring its pace of action: the time between an item’s formal entry on the agenda and subsequent institutional actions (e.g. resolutions and statements). Shifting attention from crisis-response timing to internal workflow, this approach enables systematic comparisons of processing time across items and analysis of factors linked to faster or slower decision-making. We operationalize pace of action with a new event-level dataset linking agenda items to resolutions and statements (2000–2024). Africa serves as proof of concept, but the results also show an elevated pace for counterterrorism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loureiro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: