Mixed-methods analysis explores sentiments around assessment changes, revealing public trust issues in Malta.
Malta’s National Curriculum Framework marked a paradigm shift from prescriptive syllabi to learning outcomes and continuous assessment (CA), challenging a traditional post-colonial testing culture. This study analyses 956 Facebook comments, tokenised into 971 records, concerning the 2018 introduction of CA using a mixed-methods design comprising sentiment analysis (VADER), thematic analysis and critical discourse studies. Findings reveal a heterogeneous sentiment distribution with a marginal positive lead. The dominant discursive strategies, evidentiality, legitimisation and polarisation, reflect experientially grounded public positioning within a divided narrative. Issues of fairness, trust, teaching quality, well-being and power dynamics permeate both positive and negative sentiments. Drawing on the concept of suspension, the study provides a baseline for understanding institutional trust prior the first implementation cycle. The findings suggest that trust remains at a critical threshold, with implications for assessment literacy scholarship, Malta’s forthcoming National Assessment Policy, and the role of public discourse in shaping educational reform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doreen Said Pace (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: