Differences between mitotically old and young endometrial tumors

Human tumors likely differ in their mitotic ages, reflecting how many divisions elapse between the final tumor progenitor cell and surgical removal. We used a rapidly fluctuating CpG (fCpG) methylation clock to infer relative endometrial adenocarcinomas (EAC) mitotic ages. Experimentally, young tumors initiated from single cells show low-diversity, high-variance fCpG distributions with trimodal peaks near 0%, 50%, and 100%, reflecting inherited progenitor methylation states. fCpG methylation becomes polymorphic with divisions, and older tumors exhibit higher diversity, lower variance, and unimodal distributions centered around 50%. Mitotic ages varied across EAC samples. Synchronous hyperplasia and invasive regions generally shared similar ages, and primary-metastatic EAC pairs showed both synchronous and stepwise progression. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) EACs also showed variable mitotic ages: younger tumors were enriched for proliferation pathways, whereas older tumors showed more immune infiltration, immune-pathway activation, and evidence of T-cell exhaustion. These results show that human tumors can be ranked by mitotic age and suggest that the growth of older cancers is restrained by immune surveillance.