Identifies neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and extrahepatic spread as predictors of treatment response and survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, indicating potential...
PurposeIdentifying nonresponders to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) remains challenging in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).We aimed to develop and externally validate a simple risk scoring system using baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and extrahepatic spread (EHS) to predict treatment outcomes. Materials and MethodsWe included 304 patients with uHCC receiving first-line AB from multiple Korean centers (discovery, n = 220; validation, n = 84).Study outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).Multivariable analysis identified high NLR (>4.575) and EHS as independent predictors of nonresponse.The NLR-EHS score assigned 2 points for high NLR and 1 point for EHS (range, 0-3). ResultsIn the discovery cohort, the score predicted nonresponse with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.688-0.810);ORR fell across low-(0), moderate-(1-2), and high-risk (3) groups (67.3%, 47.7%, and 8.2%; p < 0.001).Validation confirmed comparable discrimination (AUC, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.603-0.806)and a consistent ORR gradient (77.8%, 54.2%, and 22.2%; p < 0.001).The score was prognostic for OS in discovery (HR, 1.28; p = 0.003) and validation cohorts (HR, 1.45; p = 0.007), remaining significant after adjustment (adjusted HR, 1.25 and 1.61, respectively).High-risk patients had inferior median OS (6.9 vs. 17.1 months in validation). ConclusionThe NLR-EHS score is a practical tool for stratifying nonresponse risk and survival in uHCC
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: