Demonstrates improved building extraction accuracy in varying datasets, suggesting enhanced model robustness.
With the increasing diversity of remote sensing image acquisition conditions and imaging scenarios, building extraction models often experience significant performance degradation in cross-dataset applications due to variations in sensors and scene characteristics. Improving their cross-domain generalization ability has therefore become a critical research problem. To address the challenges of appearance style discrepancy and feature distribution shift in cross-domain building extraction, this paper proposes WCMNet, a wavelet-guided and CNN–Mamba hybrid network for unsupervised domain adaptation in building extraction. Specifically, a Mamba Wavelet Alignment (MWA) module is designed to align low-frequency style information in the wavelet domain while preserving directional high-frequency edge structures, thereby mitigating cross-domain appearance discrepancies and reducing structural degradation during domain translation. In addition, a Global–Local Mamba Block (GLMB) is developed to jointly model local textures and global semantic dependencies. In GLMB, the CNN branch captures fine-grained local details and boundary cues, while the Mamba branch models long-range contextual information; an adaptive gated fusion mechanism further integrates the two types of features. Experimental results on six cross-domain transfer tasks across the WHU, Massachusetts, and Potsdam datasets demonstrate that WCMNet consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art domain adaptation methods. In particular, WCMNet achieves an average IoU of 65.13% and an average BIoU of 74.80% across all transfer settings, with improvements of up to 27.35 percentage points in IoU and 38.32 percentage points in BIoU compared with the strongest competing methods. These results demonstrate that the proposed MWA and GLMB effectively improve building completeness, boundary delineation accuracy, and cross-domain robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: