PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering0 citations

Balancing Economic and Environmental Performance of PV-Battery Systems in Manufacturing under Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing

View Full Paper
JWJingwen WangLLLi Li

Key Points

  • The study aims to optimize the integration of PV-battery systems by balancing economic and environmental outcomes in manufacturing settings.
  • Proposed a bi-objective optimization framework linking PV-BES system sizing to energy dispatch and production scheduling.
  • Evaluated environmental performance using life cycle assessment (LC) metrics based on ReCiPe endpoint indicators.
  • Conducted a case study at a lithium-ion battery assembly facility to assess different operational strategies.
  • Cost-driven operations showed limited alignment with renewable energy availability leading to constrained decarbonization potential.
  • Environmentally driven strategies significantly reduced life cycle impact but at a much higher economic cost.
  • Pareto frontier analysis indicated that a balanced operating strategy can maximize environmental benefits while remaining economically viable.

Abstract

Abstract The integration of photovoltaic and battery energy storage (PV-BES) systems offers a promising pathway to reduce the environmental footprint of manufacturing facilities, but its effectiveness depends on balancing economic feasibility with environmental benefit. This study proposes a bi-objective optimization framework that links PV-BES system sizing, energy dispatch, and manufacturing production scheduling to explicitly characterize and balance the trade-off between economic cost and life cycle (LC) environmental impact under Time-of-Use (TOU) electricity pricing. By explicitly accounting for manufacturing throughput requirements and material flow constraints, and by evaluating environmental performance using LC assessment metrics based on ReCiPe endpoint indicators, the framework enables a manufacturing-aware characterization of economic-environmental trade-offs. A case study of a lithium-ion battery assembly facility shows that purely cost-driven operations prioritize short-term savings but exhibit limited alignment with renewable energy availability, constraining decarbonization potential, whereas an environmentally driven strategy substantially reduces LC impact at a significantly higher cost. Pareto frontier and knee-point analysis further demonstrate that effective manufacturing decarbonization requires explicit balancing of economic and environmental objectives, and that an intermediate operating strategy can capture much of the environmental benefit while remaining economically viable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508df96eeac72a437a128fhttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072278
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper