Version 2.0 updates evidence standards for commerce, addressing linkage and reasoning gaps in machine-readable formats.
Version 2.0 revises and supersedes Version 1.0 (April 2026) in full. It retires the CODA and T1–T8 filter terminology of the original AIVO Evidentia taxonomy in favour of the Linkage Gap and Reasoning Gap framework now used across AIVO's published research. It adds formal RFC 2119 conformance language, an evidence-confidence model distinguishing verified from self-declared claims, an explicit gap_type field marking which evidence categories are addressable through this schema versus which reflect structural model judgments that evidence alone will not override, a new section positioning brand.context against other current machine-readable standards (OKF, ARD, LLMs.txt, EntityMap), and a single canonical domain and citation chain. Version 1.0 remains archived at its original DOI for historical reference only and should not be used as the current specification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AIVO Standard (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: