Explores mental state reconstruction in novels, suggesting new insights into social cognition.
Treating the novel as a corpus of recursive social cognition, we present NoMMD, a framework that decomposes a novel into structured, per-mind mental-state records.It builds on the egocentric predicament (the axiom of fundamental disconnection of minds) which recasts the single shared model of dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) asper-mind doxastic models: no world is held in common, knowledge yields to belief, the text alone is common ground, and all representation is indexed to the mind thatholds it; from this reduction the record grammar and its typing are derived. The pipeline separates deep mentalizing from the structural processing that feeds it,mirroring the Parser-to-Engine architecture of the recursive-agent modeling which is fed with structured input in TSR framework (Tochilov, 2026). Observationbuilds the ledger; inference recovers the belief, desire, and intent behind an act and predicts the next move, with each forecast scored against the same text’scontinuation. The growing per-mind state is never overwritten; recall reads it by content, similar to a sparse distributed memory (SDM). A short original storyderived from Gruffalo (Singh et al., 2022) was decomposed; the reconstruction recovered its order-3 nested belief and forecasted each mind’s own and others’ nextmoves, conceiving the right move even where the selection slips under terror. The run over Hi-ToM and ExploreToM indicated the benchmarks’ prose inconsistencies.NoMMD can generate uncontaminated benchmarks by re-rendering (novellizing) mentalizing structures graded by recursion order. NoMMD is substrate-agnostic:consuming only a segmented record of who did and said what, it extends beyondthe novel to screenplays, transcripts, and videos reduced to text, which are closerto real, unresolved interactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serge Tochilov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: