Background Armed banditry in Northwest Nigeria has evolved from opportunistic cattle rustling into a coordinated security crisis claiming thousands of lives and displacing over 1.3 million persons between 2017 and 2025. Objective This study assesses the impact of Nigerian government responses to banditry during this period, examining whether interventions measurably reduced violence, strengthened state authority, restored human security, and addressed structural drivers of conflict. Methods A mixed-methods design combined quantitative analysis of survey data from 400 respondents across Zamfara, Katsina, and Kaduna states — using descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), chi-square analysis, and multiple linear regression — with qualitative thematic analysis of thirty-eight key informant interviews and cross-state comparative analysis of secondary security data (2017–2025). Results Quantitative findings confirm that armed banditry materially undermined national security across all measured dimensions (composite mean = 4.31, p 2 = 0.895). Conclusion Government responses have been predominantly reactive and militarized, achieving temporary tactical gains without sustainable civilian protection or structural transformation. Effective counter-banditry governance requires a strategic shift toward people-centered, integrated, and community-anchored approaches.
Zinna et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: