Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article re-evaluates χωρήσας in Irenaeus, exploring its Stoic roots and theological implications.
The article re-examines the debated phrase χωρήσας τὸν Λόγον in Adversus Haereses 3.19.1, a passage preserved in Greek by Theodoret of Cyrus. Scholarly consensus has long held that χωρήσας reflects a polemical alteration by Theodoret, intended to replace an original term more clearly aligned with Stoic mixture theory—an effort, it is argued, to distance Irenaeus’ Christology from Monophysite implications. However, I contend that this interpretation underestimates the semantic and conceptual scope of χωρεῖν itself. By situating χωρεῖν within the broader context of Stoic philosophical vocabulary, I shall argue that it remains congruent with the theory of mixture. Furthermore, this analysis brings to light the theological richness of χωρεῖν in Irenaeus’ thought, particularly its role in addressing the human capacity to receive the Logos. This re-evaluation not only challenges a long-standing critical assumption but also contributes to a deeper understanding of Stoic influence on early Christian theological discourse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benoît Benhamou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: