Why the study?
Many patients develop postoperative LV systolic dysfunction after mitral valve surgery despite preserved preoperative LVEF. This study evaluated whether preoperative fragmented QRS predicts postoperative LV systolic dysfunction after isolated mitral valve replacement.
Does preoperative fragmented QRS predict postoperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation?
Population
279 consecutive patients undergoing elective isolated mitral valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation
Comparison
Preoperative fQRS vs no fQRS
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Key result
Preoperative fragmented QRS was associated with higher postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (45.1% vs 28.8%), though the adjusted association narrowly missed significance (OR 1.90; p=0.052).
Authors
Loading...
Preoperative fQRS signals possible risk of postoperative LV dysfunction after mitral valve replacement; leaves open its role in risk stratification pending prospective validation.
Cohort (n=279)
Does preoperative fragmented QRS predict postoperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation?
Odds Ratio: 1.9 (95% CI 0.99–3.64)
Absolute Event Rate: 45.1% vs 28.8%
p-value: p=0.052
Preoperative fragmented QRS on a standard 12-lead ECG may serve as a simple, non-invasive marker to help predict the risk of postoperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement.
Balaban et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic mitral regurgitation (n=279). Preoperative fragmented QRS vs. No preoperative fragmented QRS was evaluated on Postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50% on early postoperative echocardiography) (OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.99-3.64, p=0.052). Preoperative fragmented QRS was associated with higher postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (45.1% vs 28.8%), though the adjusted association narrowly missed significance (OR 1.90; p=0.052).