Key result
Intramyocardial engineered SDF analog boosts post-MI LVEF to 57% vs 42% in controls.
Why the study?
Does an engineered SDF analog (ESA) improve cardiac function in a mouse model of myocardial infarction?
Does an engineered SDF analog (ESA) improve cardiac function in a mouse model of myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 42%
p-value: p=0.002
A computationally designed SDF-1α analog demonstrates enhanced angiogenic potential and improves post-MI cardiac function in a murine model, offering a translatable therapeutic strategy.
BACKGROUND: Experimentally, exogenous administration of recombinant stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF) enhances neovasculogenesis and cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Smaller analogs of SDF may provide translational advantages including enhanced stability and function, ease of synthesis, lower cost, and potential modulated delivery via engineered biomaterials. In this study, computational protein design was used to create a more efficient evolution of the native SDF protein. METHODS AND RESULTS: Protein structure modeling was used to engineer an SDF polypeptide analog (engineered SDF analog [ESA]) that splices the N-terminus (activation and binding) and C-terminus (extracellular stabilization) with a diproline segment designed to limit the conformational flexibility of the peptide backbone and retain the relative orientation of these segments observed in the native structure of SDF. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in ESA gradient, assayed by Boyden chamber, showed significantly increased migration compared with both SDF and control gradients. EPC receptor activation was evaluated by quantification of phosphorylated AKT, and cells treated with ESA yielded significantly greater phosphorylated AKT levels than SDF and control cells. Angiogenic growth factor assays revealed a distinct increase in angiopoietin-1 expression in the ESA- and SDF-treated hearts. In addition, CD-1 mice (n=30) underwent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery and peri-infarct intramyocardial injection of ESA, SDF-1α, or saline. At 2 weeks, echocardiography demonstrated a significant gain in ejection fraction, cardiac output, stroke volume, and fractional area change in mice treated with ESA compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with native SDF, a novel engineered SDF polypeptide analog (ESA) more efficiently induces EPC migration and improves post-myocardial infarction cardiac function and thus offers a more clinically translatable neovasculogenic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiesinger et al. (2011) studied Myocardial infarction (n=30). Engineered SDF analog (ESA) vs. Saline or native SDF-1α was evaluated on Ejection fraction at 2 weeks (p=0.002). Intramyocardial injection of an engineered SDF analog (ESA) significantly improved ejection fraction to 57% compared to 42% in controls at 2 weeks post-myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: