Comparison of ITER performance predicted by semi-empirical and theory-based transport models

The values of Q=(fusion power)/(auxiliary heating power) predicted for ITER by three different methods, i.e., transport model based on empirical confinement scaling, dimensionless scaling technique, and theory-based transport models are compared. The energy confinement time given by the ITERH-98(y,2) scaling for an inductive scenario with plasma current of 15 MA and plasma density 15 % below the Greenwald value is 3.6 s with one technical standard deviation of ±14%. These data are translated into a Q interval of [7- 13] at the auxiliary heating power Paux = 40 MW and [7 Ð 28] at the minimum heating power satisfying a good confinement ELMy H-mode. Predictions of dimensionless scalings and theory-based transport models such as Weiland, MMM and IFS/PPPL overlap with the empirical scaling predictions within the margins of uncertainty. 1.