Detects acoustic modes in microelectromechanical systems, indicating improved measurement precision.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) traditionally address vastly different length scales─one resolving atomic structure and the other, engineering macroscopic motion. Bridging these regimes is particularly compelling for high- Q membrane resonators operating at cryogenic temperatures, where conventional optical and electrical readout methods introduce dissipation, heating, or electromagnetic loading that perturbs temperature-dependent force measurements. Here, we unite these two fields by using an STM tip as both an actuator and a detector to perform minimally invasive measurements of high-aspect-ratio MEMS resonators. We resolve acoustic modes of millimeter-scale, high- Q membranes with picometer spatial precision, without relying on optical readout or capacitive coupling. Because the tunneling junction is intrinsically localized and dissipates negligible power, the measurement introduces minimal back-action or heating, enabling direct access to the intrinsic dynamics of microgram-mass oscillators. We implement three complementary detection modalities: phase-sensitive homodyne readout, rapid measurements compatible with the STM feedback cycle, and near-nonperturbative operation via controlled tip retraction─that together span a wide range of measurement conditions and enable force sensitivity on the order of a few piconewtons. These approaches establish STM as a broadband, surface-localized nanomechanical detector capable of operating where conventional optical access is impractical, including cryogenic and high-magnetic-field environments. This platform expands the experimental toolbox for nanomechanics, enabling precision measurements of forces, displacements, and pressures in suspended systems─including Casimir interactions and hybrid electromechanical devices─across cryogenic and high-field environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbertse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: